m1cele

Comment

Comment by spike77 on January 2, 2011 at 9:56am

yep its good on some things and others worthless i want to get me an astrotech 66 those are some great lil scopes and i think that f2is a battle with flats and all it picks up a lot of light always makes it a hassle i could use a bigger chip in front of it but cant afford

Comment by Marc Basti on January 1, 2011 at 4:39pm

I was looking at my old pic I did, not the prettiest thing to look at. I've actually been planning to shoot this like now because it's in a good spot from my yard but it's been nothing but clouds. Of course X-Mas eve-perfect- but you two got kids like me you DO NOT bring the tele out x-mas eve. Spike, I never thought about the image size w/h-star that much smaller (?)

Comment by Trevor Woodrow on January 1, 2011 at 2:45pm

Ohhh...I was just talking about this in Marc's processing forum. Spike, why not post the raw data from this image and let those in the group have at it? Then we can compare the results and see what worked best.

Comment by spike77 on January 1, 2011 at 1:52pm

I would love to c ur skills on this image Marc u could do it some justice!!!

Comment by spike77 on January 1, 2011 at 1:48pm

No hyperstar3 this one needs a Lot more time f6.3 I try hyprtrstar on it and it was tiny tiny !!!!! Im sure u have a nice photo of this somewhere hum Marc

Comment by Marc Basti on January 1, 2011 at 1:05pm

Spike, love the detail on the neb. What is this about a 3sec. exposure w/hyperstar haha. I would love to try one of those sometime. Sweet, Marc